BGA Senior Adviser Dr. Thitinan Pongsudhirak wrote an update for clients on the narrowing distinction between derisking and decoupling.n.

Context

  • Derisking was intended to reduce specific vulnerabilities while preserving economic interdependence, but the boundary between derisking and decoupling is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.
  • Developments in biotechnology, competing AI ecosystems and technological standards show how individually defensible restrictions and commercial choices can cumulatively deepen separation.

Significance

  • Expanding restrictions risk creating “decoupling by accumulation,” while competing U.S. and Chinese technology frameworks could pressure countries to align more closely with one ecosystem.
  • An action-reaction cycle is taking hold as U.S. restrictions spur China to build indigenous capabilities, alternative institutions and new standards, prompting Washington to tighten controls further.

Implications

  • Companies must consider whether decisions involving investment, AI models, infrastructure and technical standards could create dependencies or alignments that become increasingly costly to reverse.
  • Southeast Asian and other middle economies face narrowing room to maneuver as pressure grows to choose between U.S. and Chinese technologies, markets, capital and infrastructure.

We will continue to keep clients on top of emerging derisking and decoupling trends and dynamics in geoeconomic fragmentation. If you have comments or questions, please contact BGA Senior Adviser Dr. Thitinan Pongsudhirak at thitinan@bowergroupasia.com.

Best regards,

BowerGroupAsia